Public health crises—whether pandemics, natural disasters, or widespread infectious disease outbreaks—pose significant challenges to health systems worldwide. Among the services most affected are reproductive health and fertility care. Because reproductive services encompass a broad spectrum of care—from contraception and prenatal care to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and fertility preservation—their disruption during crises can have profound and long-lasting individual and societal consequences.
This overview examines how reproductive and infertility care are disrupted during public health crises, the mechanisms behind these disruptions, their impacts, and strategies to mitigate negative outcomes.
1. Defining Reproductive and Infertility Care
Reproductive health care includes a wide range of services related to sexual health, family planning, maternal health, pregnancy, and childbirth. It also includes access to contraception, safe abortion where legal, prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and reproductive education.
Infertility care comprises evaluation and treatment for individuals and couples who experience difficulty conceiving, including diagnostic services and fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization (IVF), intrauterine insemination (IUI), and fertility preservation techniques.
Both reproductive and infertility services are essential components of comprehensive health care.
2. Types of Public Health Crises and Their General Impacts
Public health crises vary widely:
- Pandemics (e.g., COVID-19)
- Infectious disease outbreaks (e.g., Zika, Ebola)
- Natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes)
- Technological or environmental emergencies (e.g., chemical spills)
While diverse, these crises share common impacts on health systems: resource diversion, facility closures, staffing shortages, and heightened fear of infection. These disruptions strain healthcare delivery and often disproportionately harm services not deemed immediately “life-saving,” including reproductive and fertility care.
3. Mechanisms of Disruption in Reproductive and Infertility Services
a. Health System Reallocation and Prioritization
In crises, resources (staff, facilities, funding) are often diverted toward emergency response. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals and clinics postponed elective procedures, including fertility treatments like IVF or IUI, citing infection risk and resource scarcity. Similarly, reproductive health clinics may be repurposed for COVID-19 testing or vaccination, reducing service availability.
b. Policy and Regulatory Responses
Public health directives that restrict movement or deem certain medical procedures “non-essential” can block access to care. During COVID-19 lockdowns, several regions categorized fertility services as non-urgent, leading to widespread suspension of treatments.
c. Supply Chain Interruptions
Crises often disrupt supply chains, affecting availability of essential medicines, reproductive health supplies (e.g., contraceptives), and laboratory materials critical to infertility treatments.
d. Workforce Shortages and Provider Burden
Health workers may be reassigned, fall ill, or face burnout, limiting the workforce available for reproductive care. Specialist providers (e.g., reproductive endocrinologists, gynecologists) may be particularly affected.
e. Patient Behavior and Fear
Fear of infection or misinformation may deter people from seeking in-person care. Patients may delay routine checkups, fertility evaluations, or prenatal care, risking adverse outcomes.
4. Impacts on Reproductive Health Services
a. Contraceptive Access and Unintended Pregnancies
Disruptions in supply and clinic access can lead to contraceptive shortages and reduced family planning services. This increases the risk of unintended pregnancies. During COVID-19, many individuals reported difficulties accessing contraception due to clinic closures or reduced hours.
b. Maternal and Perinatal Care
Routine prenatal visits, ultrasounds, and screening tests sometimes shifted to telehealth or were delayed. While telemedicine provided continuity of care, it could not fully replace hands-on evaluations, particularly for high-risk pregnancies.
In some outbreaks (e.g., Zika), the disease itself posed direct risks to pregnancy outcomes, including congenital anomalies, prompting increased demand for prenatal counseling and testing—often unmet during crises.
c. Safe Abortion Services
In many settings, abortion services were restricted as part of broader limitations on non-emergency care. This had implications for reproductive autonomy and forced delays or travel for care where legal.
d. STI Prevention and Treatment
Public health crises often interrupt screening programs for STIs, including HIV. Deprioritization means delayed diagnoses and treatment, undermining long-term sexual health.
5. Impacts on Infertility Care
a. Suspension of Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Infertility treatments were among the first services paused in many areas during COVID-19 because they were considered elective. This had significant clinical and emotional repercussions for patients, particularly those with age-related fertility decline or diminished ovarian reserve.
b. Delayed Diagnosis and Evaluation
Clinic closures and reduced services delayed fertility evaluations (e.g., hormone testing, semen analysis). Delay in diagnosis can impact treatment timelines and success rates, especially for time-sensitive conditions.
c. Emotional and Psychological Toll
Infertility is already associated with psychological stress. When care is disrupted, uncertainty and anxiety increase, sometimes exacerbating existing mental health conditions.
d. Financial Consequences
Fertility treatments are often costly and may not be covered by insurance. Delays can increase financial strain, especially when treatments must be repeated due to postponed cycles.
6. Disproportionate Effects on Vulnerable Populations
Crises magnify existing inequities in healthcare access:
a. Socioeconomic Disparities
Individuals with lower socioeconomic status often have less access to private care or telehealth, making them more vulnerable to service disruptions. They may lack transportation or face financial barriers that worsen during economic downturns triggered by crises.
b. Racial and Ethnic Inequities
Healthcare disparities rooted in systemic racism are exacerbated during crises. Minority populations often experience higher rates of infection and mortality and face greater challenges accessing reproductive and infertility care.
c. Geographic Barriers
Rural and underserved areas with fewer healthcare providers are disproportionately affected. Clinic closures force patients to travel longer distances if services remain at all.
d. Adolescents and Young Adults
Younger populations may lack knowledge, resources, or autonomy to navigate disrupted services, especially for confidential reproductive care.
7. Innovations and Mitigation Strategies
Despite challenges, public health crises have catalyzed adaptations that can strengthen care delivery.
a. Telehealth Expansion
Telemedicine emerged as a key tool during COVID-19. Virtual consultations allowed continued access to contraceptive counseling, prenatal check-ins, medication refills, and some aspects of fertility care counseling. Telehealth expands access, especially for those in remote regions.
Strengths: Maintains continuity, reduces infection risk, improves convenience.
Limitations: Limited for procedures requiring physical interaction (e.g., ultrasounds, egg retrievals), and dependent on technology access.
b. Task Shifting and Community Health Workers
In resource-constrained settings, training community health workers to provide basic reproductive health services, distribute contraceptives, and support prenatal care can maintain service coverage when clinicians are diverted to crisis response.
c. Flexible Policy and Regulation
Some regions introduced policy changes during crises—for example, allowing multi-month contraceptive prescriptions or expanding the scope of practice for midwives and nurse practitioners to increase service access.
These regulatory adaptations can permanently improve access beyond crises.
d. Prioritization Frameworks
To prevent blanket cancellations of fertility treatments, some professional organizations developed triage systems prioritizing patients based on urgency (e.g., age, ovarian reserve) to minimize negative outcomes. Guidelines for safe continuation, infection control, and patient support were also developed.
e. Mental Health Support Integration
Recognizing the psychological toll, many clinics and public health programs incorporated mental health services into reproductive and fertility care during crises, using virtual support groups, counseling, and stress-management resources.
8. Case Studies from Recent Crises
COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic offers the most extensive contemporary example of reproductive and infertility care disruption:
- Fertility Clinic Closures: Many jurisdictions classified fertility treatments as non-essential, halting IVF and related procedures for weeks to months.
- Reproductive Health Access: Contraceptive services experienced intermittent closures; however, telehealth helped sustain counseling and prescriptions.
- Prenatal Care Shifts: Many prenatal visits moved to hybrid models, with in-person visits limited to essential checks.
- Policy Innovations: Expanded telehealth reimbursement, regulatory flexibility for medication dispensing, and prioritization protocols for fertility care mitigated some impacts.
These shifts underscore the need for resilient systems that can adapt services during emergencies while maintaining essential reproductive care.
Zika Virus Outbreak
During the Zika outbreak (2015–2016), reproductive care faced unique challenges:
- Risk Communication: Women of reproductive age required accurate information about infection risks during pregnancy and sexual transmission.
- Family Planning Demand: Calls for access to contraception and safe abortion increased in affected regions, but stigma and legal barriers impeded care.
- Infertility Impact: Fertility clinics navigated risk of infection and adapted protocols to protect patients and staff.
This crisis highlighted the interplay between infectious disease threats and reproductive decision-making.
9. Long-Term Consequences and Recovery
The effects of disrupted reproductive and infertility care extend beyond the immediate crisis.
a. Delayed Family Planning and Increased Unintended Pregnancies
Disruptions can lead to spikes in unintended pregnancies, with implications for maternal and child health, economic stability, and social services.
b. Fertility Outcomes and Age-Related Decline
For individuals seeking fertility treatment, delays may reduce success rates due to age‐related factors, particularly among women with diminished ovarian reserve.
c. Health System Resilience and Preparedness
Recovery periods offer opportunities to strengthen infrastructure, integrate telehealth sustainably, and build policies that protect essential reproductive services during future crises.
10. Policy and System Recommendations
To safeguard reproductive and infertility care during public health emergencies, stakeholders should consider the following:
a. Designate Reproductive Care as Essential Health Services
Ensuring that reproductive and fertility services are protected and prioritized in emergency planning can prevent blanket shutdowns.
b. Strengthen Telehealth Infrastructure and Access
Investing in technology, broadband access, and training can expand care delivery options, especially for underserved populations.
c. Develop Clear Clinical Guidelines
Professional bodies should create evidence-based guidelines for care continuity during crises, including infection control and triage systems.
d. Address Equity and Social Determinants of Health
Policies must specifically address disparities in access, with targeted strategies for vulnerable groups.
e. Emergency Stockpiles and Supply Chain Planning
Anticipating supply chain disruptions by maintaining essential reproductive health inventories (e.g., contraceptives, hormones) can prevent shortages.
11. Conclusion
Public health crises expose vulnerabilities in health systems, often severely disrupting reproductive and infertility care. These disruptions can have immediate and long-lasting effects on individual lives and broader population health. Lessons from recent emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic emphasize the importance of system resilience, policy foresight, and adaptability.
Maintaining reproductive and fertility services during crises requires intentional planning, flexible delivery models, and a commitment to equity. By learning from past challenges and building robust frameworks for continuity of care, health systems can better protect reproductive health as an essential component of comprehensive healthcare—no matter the crisis.
Modern Fertility Law has made this content available to the general public for informational purposes only. The information on this site is not intended to convey legal opinions or legal advice.